For or against a single public health insurer?
Supplementary health insurance should be replaced by one single public insurer.
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
What's at stake: The debate pits the simplicity and equality of a single payer against the freedom to choose between several insurers.
The left's argument
A single public insurer is simpler, cheaper and more equal for everyone.
The right's argument
Competition between insurers drives quality and leaves patients a choice.
And you, where do you stand?
Answer 30 situations like this one and find out where you stand, topic by topic.