Ritual slaughter without stunning: for or against?
Ritual slaughter without stunning…
- Allowed, religious freedom
- Allowed with reversible stunning
- Banned, animal welfare
What's at stake: This issue divides both camps: it pits religious freedom against animal welfare, each defended on both sides.
For
religious freedom means being able to practise one's rites, including slaughter.
Against
animal welfare requires stunning, whatever the religious tradition may be.
This issue doesn't follow the left/right divide. It doesn't count towards the test score.
And you, where do you stand?
Answer 30 situations like this one and find out where you stand, topic by topic.