Should minors be tried as adults?
A 16-year-old commits a violent robbery.
- Try them as an adult: violence doesn't depend on age
- Firm sanction and educational follow-up
- Education first: it's what prevents reoffending
What's at stake: The debate is about what protects society best in the long run: an educational response for a teenager, or a sanction that matches the act.
The left's argument
A teenager is still developing. An educational approach does more to cut reoffending.
The centre's argument
A firm sanction, with real educational follow-up to get the young person back on track.
The right's argument
The seriousness of a violent act doesn't depend on age. Victims are owed firmness.
And you, where do you stand?
Answer 30 situations like this one and find out where you stand, topic by topic.