Should weapons be sent to an invaded country?
A nearby country is invaded. Should it be sent weapons?
- Yes, massively
- Yes, defensive weapons only
- No, negotiation comes first
What's at stake: Supporters and opponents exist on the left and the right: helping an attacked country defend itself, or avoiding prolonging the war and escalation.
For
helping an attacked country defend itself protects international law and lasting peace.
Against
sending weapons prolongs the war and increases the risk of dangerous escalation.
This issue doesn't follow the left/right divide. It doesn't count towards the test score.
And you, where do you stand?
Answer 30 situations like this one and find out where you stand, topic by topic.